EconWatch.com > Be smart: Jobs first, smart economy second | Stephen Kinsella
[Stephen Kinsella] But like most nice ideas, when exposed to reality, the smart economy just breaks down. The smart economy as a concept takes no notice of the detail: who is looking for what type of job right now, and how long will it take those people to train for new ones?
[Previous] cryptogon.com » UK Economy Lies 'On Bed of Nitrog...
[Next] Governor says Florida economy percolating, wants 4 percent bud...
Some related posts from Technorati and Google.
[progressive-economy@tasc] progressive-economy@tasc: There are smarter ways to ecoomic recovery: The smart economy is a nice idea, perhaps even a good idea. But like most nice ideas, when exposed to reality, the smart economy just breaks down. The smart economy as a concept takes no notice of the detail: who is looking for what type .... Dr. Stephen Kinsella (Dept. of Economics, UL); Marie Sherlock (economist, SIPTU); Michael Burke is former senior international economist with Citibank in London; Michael Taft (Research Officer, Unite); Paul Sweeney (Economic Advisor, ...
[Stephen Kinsella] UL Students: Awesome. | Stephen Kinsella: Secondly, decrease in the taxes would lead to the increase in investments…Foreign countries would invest more in Ireland and open their businesses here .We have to remember that soon every country would finally beat the recession and Ireland has to be prepared for the potencial investors giving them the best conditions for the opening up their businesses such as decrease in the tax.
Against Monopoly: It was not until about the mid 80's when I first noted that a new generation of counsel were entering the field of patent law who held somewhat different views. This happened about the time when "intellectual property" was "discovered" by some withing the legal profession as a financially attractive addition to their practice, and particularly those in hitherto general practice firms who were focused just on litigation and largely eschewed getting their hands and fingernails dirty by actually learning the law from the ground up, a learning process that in my view requires a thorough mastery of the MPEP, 37 C.F.R., Title 35 and associated case law.
[The Cedar Lounge Revolution] The indiscreet complacency of the bourgeoisie: A review of Stephen ...: The Ireland I see in 2050 is distopian, in fact, because of the existence of income and health inequality, the reduction in privacy, the divorce and leisure booms, the social, political and cultural impact of an aging population on Irish society, not to mention climate change, globalisation, changes in industrial structure and the nature of work, and, of course, the changing role of the family. I think you may need to put that cat down, switch off the Chopin, and re-read the book in places, Dr.X, I’m more than happy to point you to page numbers to check if you’re short on time.
[Mises Economics Blog] Apple the Monopolist - Jeffrey Tucker - Mises Economics Blog: However, they have historically not had a majority market share, so no one, other than some technical enthusiast, have noticed. But, like with the app store and the move to a PC architecture, Apple will eventually have to open up their platform, or someone else will either beat their product or will create a product that is almost as good as the iPad, but more open that will take away market share from Apple.
[StephanKinsella.com] Rand on IP, Owning “Values”, and “Rearrangement Rights”: Let’s be clear: your hypos is this: suppose you tried to trespass against me and my property, to stop me from using it as I see fit, because you think you have a partial ownership claim over my property, due to your thinking of a useful way to use your property. I.e., you want to use force to stop me from, say, tuning my fuel injector on my car, with my hands and tools, sitting in my driveway–because of your delusion that you have some claim over my property because you filed a document with some “invention claim company”
Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, Economy, EconWatch.com